欢迎访问《现代矿业》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:
×

扫码分享

现代矿业 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (07): 51-.

• 采矿工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

FAHP 在尖山地采矿山采矿方法优选中的应用

陈树林1 李亮2 薛丽娟1 周科平2 袁丹灵2   

  1. 1. 攀钢矿业有限公司攀枝花铁矿;2. 中南大学资源与安全工程学院
  • 出版日期:2022-07-25 发布日期:2023-06-07
  • 基金资助:
    *国家重点研发计划项目(编号:2020YFC1909801)。

Application of FAHP in Mining Method Optimization of Jianshan Mine

CHEN Shulin1 LI Liang2 XUE Lijuan1 ZHOU Keping2 YUAN Danling2   

  1. 1. Panzhihua Iron Mine,Panzhihua Mining Co.,Ltd.; 2. School of Resource and Safety Engineering,Central South University
  • Online:2022-07-25 Published:2023-06-07

摘要: 采矿方法对矿山开采至关重要,而采矿方法的选择是一项复杂而系统的工作。为兼 顾不确定性因素和可量化因素对采矿方法选择的影响,提出了一种适合地下金属矿床采矿方法决 策的模糊层次分析法(FAHP)。以尖山地采矿山为例,对4 种备选采矿方法进行模糊层次分析,得 出4 种方法的综合优选度分别为81.09%,78.19%,93.67% 和92.30%,从而确定分段凿岩阶段出矿 嗣后充填法最优。模糊层次法在采矿方法选择中的应用,有效提高了决策效率,为地下金属矿床 开采方法的比选提供了一种可靠的方法。

关键词: 采矿方法比选, 模糊层次分析, 综合评判, 综合优选度

Abstract: Mining method is very important for mining,and the selection of mining method is a com⁃ plex and systematic work. In order to consider the influence of uncertainty and quantifiable factors on min⁃ ing method selection,a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process(FAHP)method suitable for mining method deci⁃ sion of underground metal deposits is proposed. Taking Jianshan Mine as an example,four alternative min⁃ ing methods are analyzed by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,and the comprehensive optimization degrees of the four methods are 81.09%,78.19%,93.67% and 92.30% respectively,so as to determine the opti⁃ mal stage of sublevel drilling and subsequent filling method. The application of FAHP in the selection of mining methods effectively improves the decision-making efficiency and provides a reliable method for the comparison and selection of mining methods for underground metal deposits.

Key words: mining method comparison, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, comprehensive evaluation, comprehensive optimization