欢迎访问《现代矿业》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:
×

扫码分享

现代矿业 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (09): 77-82.

• 采矿工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于3DEC的坑山矿区-10 m中段采场点柱设置模拟分析

刘潭洲1 郑永升1 吴子骏2   

  1. 1. 山东金洲矿业集团有限公司;2. 中南大学资源与安全工程学院
  • 出版日期:2026-09-25 发布日期:2026-10-10

Simulation Analysis of Pillar Setting in the -10 m Mining Section of Kengshan Mining Area Based on 3DEC

LIU Tanzhou1 ZHENG Yongsheng1 WU Zijun2   

  1. 1. Shandong Jinzhou Mining Industry Group Co.,Ltd.; 2. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University
  • Online:2026-09-25 Published:2026-10-10

摘要: 采场结构参数设定对矿山生产的安全性和经济效益具有重大影响,以某萤石矿山 -10 m 中段典型采场为研究背景,采用 3DEC 作为模拟工具,重点研究点柱支撑面积的合理大小。 对不同点柱数量下支撑面积的应力进行分析,评估不同点柱结构在当前开采情况下的有效性及其 对周围岩体稳定性的影响。模拟结果显示:方案 2(3 个点柱)的第三主应力(最大 10.62 MPa,最小 -0.12 MPa)和第一主应力(最大95.02 MPa,最小0.95 MPa)在3种方案中处于中间值,表明在该方案下, 压力和拉力之间有相对合理的分布。各方案点柱的应力集中系数分别为0.67、0.95 以及1.05。方案1、 2上覆岩层的应力集中系数在1.2~1.5,方案3则高达2.4。由此可知:方案1、2都具有较好的结构稳定 性,并显示出较低的风险水平,但方案2平衡了应力集中与矿体自承载能力,且在施工速度、材料使用 方面提供了更优的平衡,是该采场应力管理和结构稳定性较好的选择。

关键词: 数值模型, 点柱设置, 采场结构优化

Abstract: The setting of mining site structural parameters has a significant impact on the safety and economic efficiency of mining operations. This study takes the typical mining section at the -10 m level of a certain fluorite mine as the research background,using 3DEC as the simulation tool,and focuses on the study of the reasonable size of the pillar support area. The stress of the support area under different numbers of pillars is analyzed,and the effectiveness of different pillar structures under the current mining conditions and their impact on the stability of the surrounding rock are evaluated. The simulation results show that in Scheme 2 (with 3 pillars),the third principal stress (maximum 10.62 MPa,minimum -0.12 MPa) and the first principal stress (maximum 95.02 MPa,minimum 0.95 MPa) are in the middle range among the three schemes,indicating a relatively reasonable distribution of pressure and tension in this scheme. The stress concentration coefficients of the pillars in each scheme are 0.67,0.95,and 1.05. The stress concentration co⁃ efficients of the overlying rock layers in Scheme 1 and Scheme 2 are between 1.2 and 1.5,while Scheme 3 is as high as 2.4. Therefore,it can be concluded that both Scheme 1 and Scheme 2 have good structural stabili⁃ ty and show a lower risk level. However,Scheme 2 balances the stress concentration and the self-bearing ca⁃ pacity of the ore body,and provides a better balance in terms of construction speed and material usage. It is a better choice for stress management and structural stability of this mining section.

Key words: numerical model, pillar setting, stope structure optimization