欢迎访问《现代矿业》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:
×

扫码分享

现代矿业 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (03): 139-143.

• 岩土工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

矿山排土场设计中截洪沟洪峰流量计算方法比较与分析

秦 柯1,2,3 伊龙跃4 赵远群4   

  1. 1. 金属矿山开采安全与灾害防治全国重点实验室;2. 中钢集团马鞍山矿山研究总院股份有限公司; 3. 非煤露天矿山灾害防控国家矿山安全监察局重点实验室;4. 山东众博工程设计有限公司
  • 出版日期:2026-03-25 发布日期:2026-04-10

Comparison and Analysis of Calculation Methods of Flood Peak Flow in Flood Interception Ditch in Design of Mine Dump

QIN Ke1,2,3 YI Longyue4 ZHAO Yuanqun4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Metal Mining Safety and Disaster Prevention and Control; 2. Sinosteel Maanshan General Institute of Mining Research Co.,Ltd.;3. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Control in Non-coal Open-pit Mines,National Mine Safety Administration; 4. Shandong Zhongbo Engineering Design Co.,Ltd.
  • Online:2026-03-25 Published:2026-04-10

摘要: 截洪沟是矿山排土场防洪减灾的核心构筑物,其断面尺寸等关键参数直接取决于洪 峰流量计算结果,不同计算方法所得数值差异明显,直接关系排土场工程安全与设计经济性,结 合工程实际筛选适配计算方法,对保障排土场稳定、控制工程成本意义重大。以南方山区某一级 排土场为例,依据现行矿山排土场设计规范,选取简化推理公式法、水科院经验公式法、公路研究 所经验公式法及地区经验公式法 4 种常用方法,针对 1.5,4.0 km² 2 组典型汇水面积开展洪峰流量 计算,对比分析各方法的适用性与计算偏差。结果显示:汇水面积小于 3 km²时,简化推理公式法、 水科院经验公式法、地区经验公式法计算偏差小、贴合现场实际,可相互印证保障精度;汇水面积 大于 3 km²时,推荐以地区经验公式法和水科院经验公式法为主,简化推理公式法用于校核;公路 研究所经验公式法结果偏保守、偏差大,仅适用于缺乏当地水文资料时的应急简易计算,虽安全但 易增加成本。本研究明确了各类方法的适用范围,可为排土场截洪沟设计提供参考,帮助设计人 员按需选型,兼顾工程安全与经济性。

关键词: 排土场, 截洪沟, 洪峰流量, 汇水面积, 降雨强度, 径流系数

Abstract: The flood interception ditch is the core structure of the mine dump for flood control and di‐ saster reduction. The key parameters such as the section size directly depend on the calculation results of the flood peak flow. The numerical values obtained by different calculation methods are obviously differ‐ ent,which is directly related to the safety and design economy of the dump project. It is of great signifi‐ cance to screen and adapt the calculation method to ensure the stability of the dump and control the proj‐ ect cost. Taking a first-class dump in the southern mountainous area as an example,according to the cur‐ rent design code of mine dump,four commonly used methods,including simplified reasoning formula method,empirical formula method of Chinese Academy of Water Sciences,empirical formula method of Highway Research Institute and regional empirical formula method,were selected to calculate the flood peak flow for two typical catchment areas of 1.5 km2 and 4.0 km2 ,and the applicability and calculation de‐ viation of each method were compared and analyzed. The results show that when the catchment area is less than 3 km2 ,the calculation deviation of the simplified reasoning formula method,the empirical formula method of the Chinese Academy of Water Sciences and the regional empirical formula method is small, which is in line with the actual situation of the site and can verify the accuracy of the guarantee. When the catchment area is greater than 3 km2 ,the regional empirical formula method and the empirical formula method of the Chinese Academy of Water Sciences are recommended,and the simplified reasoning formula method is used for verification. The results of the empirical formula method of the Highway Research Insti‐ tute are conservative and have large deviations. It is only suitable for simple emergency calculations when there is a lack of local hydrological data. Although it is safe,it is easy to increase costs. This study clarifies the scope of application of various methods,which can provide reference for the design of flood intercep‐ tion ditch in dump,help designers to select on demand,and take into account the safety and economy of the project.

Key words: dump, flood interception ditch, flood peak flow, catchment area, rainfall intensity, run‐ off coefficient