欢迎访问《现代矿业》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:
×

扫码分享

现代矿业 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 55-59。64.

• 采矿工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

某铁锌矿扩建采矿方法优选

居福明1 彭敏杰1 李庚斯2 刘东锐3 张忠传3 钟生元3   

  1. 1. 内蒙古兴业集团融冠矿业有限公司;2. 银漫矿业有限责任公司3. 长沙矿山研究院有限责任公司
  • 出版日期:2025-11-25 发布日期:2025-12-18

Optimization of Mining Method for Expansion of an Iron-Zinc Mine

  1. 1. Rongguan Mining Co.,Ltd.,Inner Mongolia Xingye Group;2. Yinman Mining Co.,Ltd.; 3. Changsha Institute of Mining Research Co.,Ltd.
  • Online:2025-11-25 Published:2025-12-18

摘要: 某铁锌矿原采用无底柱分段崩落法开采,三期工程要进行扩建,需要确定其开采方法。 结合矿山地质条件,初选出无底柱分段崩落法、分段凿岩阶段空场嗣后充填采矿法、大直径深孔阶段 出矿嗣后充填采矿法3种方法。对比分析3种回采方案的优缺点、技术经济指标,优选出分段凿岩阶 段空场嗣后充填采矿法与无底柱分段崩落法,后续从安全性、生产衔接、生态及社会效益3个维度对 方案进行对比论证。研究结果表明:矿山剩余生产年限有限,矿体向下出现尖灭,沿用无底柱分段崩 落法不会扩大移动圈范围,反而分段凿岩阶段空场嗣后充填法容易出现一步骤未接顶、二步骤顶板 悬空垮冒难题;生产衔接方面,沿用崩落法即可满足 135万 t/a的生产需求,无生产衔接问题,而分段 凿岩阶段空场嗣后充填法需布置3个中段才可满足生产需求,需要3~4 a才能达产;生态方面,崩落法 对塌陷坑以外的地表影响较小,且完成相应复垦,边坡进行了相应监测,而矿山充填法存在取水难 题;社会效益方面,采用崩落法较充填法净利润多15 118.61万元。最终认为,无底柱分段崩落法是该 矿现阶段的最优选择。

关键词: 采矿方法优选, 无底柱分段崩落法, 分段凿岩阶段空场嗣后采矿法, 大直径深孔阶, 段出矿嗣后充填采矿法

Abstract: An iron-zinc mine was originally mined by non-pillar sublevel caving method. The third phase of the project needs to be expanded,and its mining method needs to be determined. Combined with the geological conditions of the mine,three methods of non-pillar sublevel caving method,sublevel drilling stage open stoping with subsequent filling mining method and large-diameter deep hole stage ore removal with subsequent filling mining method are selected. By comparing and analyzing the advantages and disad⁃ vantages,technical and economic indicators of the three mining schemes,the sublevel drilling stage open stoping with subsequent filling mining method and the non-pillar sublevel caving method are optimized. The optimized schemes are compared and demonstrated from the three dimensions of safety,production connec⁃ tion,ecology and social benefits. The research results show that the remaining production years of the mine are limited,and the ore body is pinched out downward. The use of the non-pillar sublevel caving method will not increase the range of the moving circle. On the contrary,the sublevel drilling stage open-stope sub⁃ sequent filling method is prone to the problem of one-step unroofing and two-step roof hanging collapse. In terms of production connection,the caving method can meet the production demand of 1.35 million t/a,and there is no production connection problem,while the sublevel drilling stage open field subsequent filling method needs to arrange three middle sections to meet the production demand,and it takes 3~4 years to reach the production. In terms of ecology,the caving method has little influence on the surface outside thecollapse pit and completes the corresponding reclamation,and the slope is monitored accordingly,while the mine filling method has the problem of water intake. In terms of social benefits,the net profit of the caving method is 151.186 1 million yuan more than that of the filling method. Finally,it is considered that the pil⁃ larless sublevel caving method is the best choice for the mine at this stage.

Key words: mining method optimization, non-pillar sublevel caving method, sublevel drilling stage open stoping with subsequent filling mining method, large-diameter deep hole stage ore removal with subse? quent filling mining method