欢迎访问《现代矿业》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:
×

扫码分享

现代矿业 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 227-231.

• 实用技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于LS-DYNA的分段充填采矿法二步骤护壁矿柱厚度研究

李国平 朱贵伟 杨 昶   

  1. 安徽马钢矿业资源集团姑山矿业有限公司白象山矿业分公司
  • 出版日期:2025-11-25 发布日期:2025-12-23

Study on the Thickness of Two-step Wall Protection Pillar of Sublevel Filling Mining Method Based on LS-DYNA

  1. Baixiangshan Mining Branch Co.,Ltd.,Anhui Masteel Mining Resources Group Gushan Mining Co., Ltd.
  • Online:2025-11-25 Published:2025-12-23

摘要: 针对某铁矿二步骤充填采矿法回采工程实际,采用 LS-DYNA 数值模拟工具,探究护 壁矿柱尺寸对充填体稳定性的调控机制。回采期间,充填体需承受上覆围岩静荷载与二步骤回采爆 破动力荷载的耦合作用,合理设置护壁矿柱厚度是削弱爆破扰动,保障充填体稳定的关键工程。选 取 1.2~2.3 m 典型护壁矿柱厚度区间,系统分析不同尺寸下充填体的 Von Mises 应力演化与位移响应 规律。数值计算结果显示:护壁矿柱厚度递增时,充填体应力极大值呈显著递减趋势,1.2 m 厚度下 应力峰值达 2.20 MPa,2.3 m 厚度下降至 0.80 MPa,降幅 63.77%;当厚度大于1.5 m 时,充填体应力分 布趋于平稳,可有效规避不可逆破坏;不同护壁厚度下充填体位移均远低于损伤阈值。综合矿业工 程安全回采与资源利用效率要求,建议护壁矿柱厚度不小于 1.5 m。该研究为充填采矿法中护壁矿 柱的工程参数优化提供了理论依据,对提升铁矿回采安全性、降低工程风险具有重要实践价值。

关键词: LS-DYNA, 充填体, 护壁矿柱, 爆破扰动

Abstract: In view of the actual mining engineering of two-step filling mining method in an iron mine, the numerical simulation tool of LS-DYNA is used to explore the regulation mechanism of the size of the pil⁃ lar on the stability of the filling body. During the mining period,the filling body needs to bear the coupling effect of the static load of the overlying surrounding rock and the dynamic load of the two-step mining blast⁃ ing. The reasonable setting of the thickness of the wall protection pillar is the key projects to weaken the blasting disturbance and ensure the stability of the filling body. The thickness range of 1.2 ~ 2.3 m typical wall protection pillar is selected,and the Von Mises stress evolution and displacement response law of fill⁃ ing body under different sizes are systematically analyzed. The numerical calculation results show that when the thickness of the pillar increases,the maximum stress of the filling body shows a significant decreasing trend. The peak stress at the thickness of 1.2 m reaches 2.20 MPa,and the thickness of 2.3 m decreases to 0.80 MPa,a decrease of 63.77 %. When the thickness is greater than 1.5 m,the stress distribution of the filling body tends to be stable,which can effectively avoid irreversible damage. The displacement of filling body under different retaining wall thickness is much lower than the damage threshold. According to the re⁃ quirements of safe mining and resource utilization efficiency of comprehensive mining engineering,it is sug⁃ gested that the thickness of wall protection pillar should not be less than 1.5 m. This study provides a theoret⁃ ical basis for the optimization of engineering parameters of retaining pillars in filling mining method,and has important practical value for improving the safety of iron ore mining and reducing engineering risks.