欢迎访问《现代矿业》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:
×

扫码分享

现代矿业 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (06): 102-108.

• 采矿工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

顶底柱残矿资源回采方案优化及稳定性研究

庞易杰1 梁永胜1 张先泽1 阳德华1 廖敦霞2,3 梁巨理2,3 吕 昊2,3   

  1. 1. 四川里伍铜业股份有限公司;2. 长沙矿山研究院有限责任公司; 3. 国家金属采矿工程技术研究中心
  • 出版日期:2026-06-25 发布日期:2026-07-22

Stability Research and Plans Optimization for Top and Bottom Pillar Residual Ore Resources Mining

PANG Yijie1 LIANG Yongsheng1 ZHANG Xianze1 YANG Dehua1 LIAO Dunxia2,3 LIANG Juli2,3 LYU Hao2,3   

  1. 1. Sichuan Liwu Copper Industry Co.,Ltd.; 2. Changsha Mining Research Institute Co.,Ltd.; 3. National Metal Mining Engineering Technology Research Center
  • Online:2026-06-25 Published:2026-07-22

摘要: 里伍铜矿过去采用浅孔房柱法开采,留设了大量顶底柱支撑顶板围岩,由于放置已 久,回收难度大,安全风险高。为解决此问题,针对里伍铜矿高价值的顶底柱残矿资源开展了回采 方案优选及稳定性分析研究。研究提出 3 种适用于里伍铜矿顶底柱资源的回采方案,并对回采工 艺进行了详细阐述及优缺点对比分析。方案 1 为机械化预切顶中深孔爆破底柱回采方案,方案 2 为预留护壁进路式胶结充填法回采方案(下中段空区不充填),方案 3 为预留护壁进路式胶结充填 法回采方案(下中段空区充填)。结果表明:方案 1 回采效率高,但作业人员直接暴露在空区下作 业,安全风险高。方案 2 需要留取一定的底柱护壁,防止揭穿空区,有一定的安全风险。方案 3 下 部未留取护壁,需要在保证充填体质量的前提下才可安全回采顶底柱。在此基础上,对顶底柱资 源的安全回采进行了稳定性对比分析得出,在下中段未充填情况下,应保证护壁的厚度,严禁揭穿 护壁,必要时,护壁区域须进行锚杆等支护措施。在下中段已充填情况下,顶底柱下部未留取护 壁,需要特别注意顶底柱空区顶板及护壁的节理裂隙的发育情况。

关键词: 残矿资源, 顶底柱回采, 回采方案, 稳定性分析

Abstract: In the past,the Liwu Copper Mine adopted the shallow-hole room-and-pillar mining method,leaving many top and bottom pillars to support the roof and surrounding rock. Due to the long peri⁃ od of storage,the recovery was difficult and the safety risks were high. To solve this problem,a study on the selection of mining plans and stability analysis was conducted for the high-value top and bottom pillar residual ore resources of the Liwu Copper Mine. Three mining plans suitable for the top and bottom pillar resources of the Liwu Copper Mine were proposed,and the mining process was elaborated and the advan⁃ tages and disadvantages were compared. Plan 1 is a mechanized pre-cutting of middle-depth holes in the top and bottom pillar backfilling mining plan. Plan 2 is a reserved casing route type cemented filling min⁃ ing plan(the lower middle section void area is not filled). Plan 3 is a reserved casing route type cemented filling plan(the lower middle section void area has been filled). The results show that Plan 1 has high min⁃ ing efficiency,but the workers are directly exposed to the void area during operation,resulting in high safety risks. Plan 2 requires certain bottom pillars to be reserved as casings to prevent the void area from being penetrated,which has certain safety risks. Plan 3 does not reserve casings at the lower part,and safe mining of the top and bottom pillars can only be carried out under the premise of ensuring the quality of the filling body. Based on this,a stability comparison analysis of the safe mining of top and bottom pillar resources was conducted,and it was concluded that in the case of not filling the lower middle section,the thickness of the casing should be guaranteed,and the void area casing should not be penetrated. In the case of filling the lower middle section,special attention should be paid to the development of joint fis⁃ sures and fractures in the top and bottom pillar void area and the casing.

Key words: residual ore resources, top and bottom pillar mining, mining plan, stability analysis