欢迎访问《现代矿业》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

现代矿业 ›› 2011, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 47-48,64.

• 安全与环保 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于FLAC3D强度折减法的三种收敛判据的比较分析

王少华1,赵宗勇2,郭靖2,杨金强2   

  1. 1.三峡大学;2.三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室
  • 出版日期:2011-02-15 发布日期:2011-02-22

Three Types Convergences of the Comparative Analysis Based on FLAC3D Strength Reduction Method

Wang Shaohua1,Zhao Zongyong2,Guo Jing2,Yang Jinqiang2   

  1. 1. China Three Gorges University;2. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on  Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education
  • Online:2011-02-15 Published:2011-02-22

摘要: 运用FLAC3D对一个简单土坡算例进行计算,分别运用目前常用的收敛判据、位移突变和塑性区判据来求得安全系数,这三个判据计算出的结果相近且都与FLAC内置fish语言求解安全系数的答案接近,说明在今后的具体运用中,以塑性区为判据会得到比较保守的安全系数,而采用监测关键点的位移相对比较直观精确,同时基于以上判据,综合考虑其他判据,使各判据在使用中尽量提高精度,这样才会得到比较可靠的结果。

关键词: FLAC强度折减, 安全系数, 失稳判据, 塑性区, 最大不平衡力, 特征点位移

Abstract: FLAC3D was used to analyzed a simple slope,the convergence criterion, displacement mutation criterion and plastic zone criterion which were now commonly used to seek safety factor separately. the calculate results of the three criterias were similar,what,s more ,they were close to the tranditional answer of safety factor which was solved by built-in language.It was illustrated that the plastic zone would be more conservative as the criterion of the safety factor, but by monitoring the displacement of key points was relatively straightforward precision. In order to maximize the accuracy, we should take the  other criterias  into account and at the same time based on the above criterias in the future specific using. This would get more reliable results.

Key words: FLAC strength reduction, Safety factor, Failure criterion, Plastic zone, Maximum unbalanced force, Displacement of feature points